Monday, December 23, 2013

 







 

Ernst Cassirer Courtesy UiO

 

 

 E R N S T  C A S S I R E R

 

Father Eduard Cassirer (1843-1916)
Mother Eugenie (Jenny) Cassirer (1848-1904)



Ernst Cassirer (1874 – 1945) was a German philosopher. Trained within the Neo-Kantian Marburg School, he initially followed his mentor Hermann Cohen in attempting to supply an idealistic philosophy of science; after Cohen's death, he developed a theory of symbolism, and used it to expand phenomenology of knowledge into a more general philosophy of culture. He is one of the leading 20th century advocates of philosophical idealism.

Cassirer was born in Breslau (Wrocław), Silesia, into a Jewish family. He studied literature and philosophy at the University of Berlin. After working for many years as a Privatdozent at the Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin, he was elected in 1919 to the Philosophy chair at the newly founded University of Hamburg, where he lectured until 1933, supervising amongst others the doctoral thesis of Leo Strauss. Because he was Jewish, he left Germany when the Nazis came to power. 

Cassirer was professor in Goteborg from 1935 to 1941. This episode of his life is little known, even though the Swedish years were very important. During that time of political turmoil he wrote several books and most of the papers that are now being published posthumously. This book -- based on recently discovered sources -- gives a detailed picture of Cassirer's life and work in Sweden. It explains how he was invited to Sweden and why he became a Swedish citizen. The analyses show how Cassirer's exchange with Swedish philosophers influenced his work and shed new light on his development during exile. This study also contains an introduction by John Michael Krois, a chronology of the Swedish years and a description of the long lost manuscript of Das Erkenntnisproblem, volume four

After leaving Germany he taught for a couple of years in Oxford, before becoming a professor at Gothenburg University. When Cassirer considered Sweden too unsafe, he applied for a post at Harvard, but was rejected because thirty years earlier he had rejected a job offer from them. In 1941 he became a visiting professor at Yale University, before moving to Columbia University in New York City, where he lectured from 1943 until his death in 1945.

His son, Heinz Cassirer, was also a Kantian scholar.








Cassirer's first major published writings were a history of modern thought from the Renaissance to Kant. In accordance with his Marburg neo-Kantianism he concentrated upon epistemology. His reading of the scientific revolution, in books such as The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy (1927), as a “Platonic” application of mathematics to nature, influenced historians such as E. A. Burtt, E.J Dikjsterhuis, and Alexandre Koyre.

In Substance and Function (1910), he writes about late nineteenth-century developments in physics and the foundations of mathematics. In Einstein's Theory of Relativity (1921) he defended the claim that modern physics supports a neo-Kantian conception of knowledge. He also wrote a book about Quantum Mechanics called Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics (1936).

At Hamburg Cassirer discovered the Library of the Cultural Sciences founded by Aby Warburg. Warburg was an art historian who was particularly interested in ritual and myth as sources of surviving forms of emotional expression. In Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923–1929) Cassirer argues that man (as he put it in his more popular 1944 book Essay on Man) is a "symbolic animal". Whereas animals perceive their world by instincts and direct sensory perception, humans create a universe of symbolic meanings. Cassirer is particularly interested in natural language and myth. He argues that science and mathematics developed from natural language, and religion and art from myth.








In 1929 Cassirer took part in an historically significant encounter with Martin Heidegger in Davos. Cassirer argues that while Kant's Critique of Pure Reason emphasizes human temporality and finitude, he also sought to situate human cognition within a broader conception of humanity. Cassirer challenges Heidegger's relativism by invoking the universal validity of truths discovered by the exact and moral sciences.

Cassirer believed that reason's self-realization leads to human liberation. Mazlish (2000) however notes that Cassirer in his The Philosophy of the Enlightenment (1932) focuses exclusively on ideas, ignoring the political and social context in which they were produced.

In The Logic of the Cultural Sciences (1942) Cassirer argues that objective and universal validity can not only be achieved in the sciences, but also in practical, cultural, moral, and aesthetic phenomena. Although inter-subjective objective validity in the natural sciences derives from universal laws of nature, Cassirer asserts that an analogous type of inter-subjective objective validity takes place in the cultural sciences.



Cassirer as head of Univ of Hamburg 1929-1930 UHH/Archive



Cassirer's last work The Myth of the State (1946) was published posthumously; at one level it is an attempt to understand the intellectual origins of Nazi Germany. Cassirer sees Nazi Germany as a society in which the dangerous power of myth is not checked or subdued by superior forces. 










The book discusses the opposition of logos and mythos in Greek thought, Plato's Republic, the medieval theory of the state, Machiavelli, Thomas Carlyle's writings on hero worship, the racial theories of Arthur de Govineau and Hegel. 

Cassirer claimed that in 20th century politics there was a return, with the passive acquiescence of Martin Heidegger, to the irrationality of myth, and in particular to a belief that there is such a thing as destiny. 

Of this passive acquiescence, Cassirer says that in departing from Husserl's belief in an objective, logical basis for philosophy, Heidegger attenuated the ability of philosophy to oppose the resurgence of myth in German politics of the 1930s.



 

  • Substance and Function (1910) & Einstein's Theory of Relativity (1921), English translation 1923 Kant's Life and Thought (1918), English translation 1981
  • Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923–29), English translation 1953–1957
  • Language and Myth (1925), English translation 1946 by Susanne K. Langer
  • The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy (1927), English translation 1963 by Mario Domandi
  • Philosophy of the Enlightenment (1932), English translation 1951
  • Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics: Historical and Systematic Studies of the Problem of Causality (1936), English translation 1956
  • The Logic of the Cultural Sciences (1942), English translation 2000 by S.G. Lofts (previously translated in 1961 as The Logic of the Humanities)
  • An Essay on Man (written and published in English) (1944)
  • The Myth of the State (written and published in English) (posthumous) (1946)
  • The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science, and History since Hegel (1950) 
  • Symbol, Myth, and Culture: Essays and Lectures of Ernst Cassirer, 1935-1945 ed. by Donald Phillip Verene (1981)

Source: Wikipedia

 

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

SJF


















Aaaron Isaac (1730-1815) Kilde: Wikipedia





A A R O N  I S A A C 


En kulturbild från Gustaviansk tid


Det är ett ragat sekel sedan Aaron Isaac, “Den förste svenske juden” dog. Men han tar forfarande livlig del i sina trosföranveters görandens ock latanden. Med sina kloka bruna ögon, sina levnadsvist valvda ögonbryn ock med de tunna enn smula spefulla lapparna slutna kring outallade sentenser ock sarkasmer följer alltjämt den repurterlige och valputsader rokokojuden från sitt oljefargsporträtt i sessionssalnedet pittoreska livet i Stockholm mosaisk församling som han själ lagt grunden till.

Hans memorer vilka församlingsarkivet bevarar som ett av den svenska judendomens märkligast ekulturdokument börja for att han knappast later sig forbryllas av den livfyllda hetsighet varmed hans avkomlingar ock stamfränder ägna sig at fromhet, social arbete, adminstrative gröl och itnerna schismer av skiftande slag. 

Själv var han en trogen son av och har nogsamt prövat på judarnas temperamentsfulla och gentemot varandra hyperkritiska släkte, hans minnen profilera en rätt medveten och karsk karatar beredd att göra goda gärningar, att understödja och hjälpa men också med otvetydigt krav på respect och tacksamhet for alla prestationer. Han var en patriark som inte gärna talde opposition ock kritik av sina församlingsbröder och som ofta fulldes av självrättfärdig forvaning over tredskande ock tirilska. 

Men i all sin egenmäktighet var han en ärans man, en baal-habajis som redligt sörjede för sitt hus och for de sinam from ock hjälpsam ock ingalunda obevandrad i skifterna. Därtill kom att han hade en obestridlig charm, som betog de kristna, han hade att handla med, och en pondus, som lande stamforvänterna till gagn ock säkrade deras existens i Sverige trots ovilja och motstand från många vedersakare. 

Den upplaga av Aaron Isaacs minnen, som J. Seligman 1897 utgav, är synnerligen svårtillgänglig och motsvarar knappast heller moderna krav. Det är därfor med stor tillfredsställese man hälsar Judiska literatursamfundets nya edition av dessa anteckningar, vilka kulturhistoriska värde, även for svensk historia är obestridlig. 

Den svenska memoarlitteraturen från den gustavianska tiden är ju övervägnade aristorkratisk, ock därfor äro Isaacs notiser ock reflexioner av största intresse, då de ge den ofrölses och därtill judens syn på sin omgivning. 

Det är en hel del av epokens märkligare tilldragelser, som skympta förbi. Vid ett tilfälle inblandades Aaron Isaac rent av i en inrikespolitisk affär av stora mått, den munchska förfalskningshistorien ur vilken han f.o gik med bibehållen prestige ock rent samvete. 

Antekningarnas kallväde är synnerligen högt ock vittnar om skribentens minnesklarhet och sin for fakticiteter. Hans omutliga saklighet är ofta beskuten av en trang horisont: det är mycket som går den judiska affärsmannen forbid, fångad som han äre av familie och församlingsinteressen, men denna bundenhet av kretsen är forklarlig och naturlig ock har därtill blivit av positiv innebörd för hans efterkommande trosfränder. Han lade dock grunden. 

Till Aaron Isaacs minnen, vilkas text på ett fortjänstfullt sätt ederats av Abraham Brody, sluter sig i den föreliggande volymen forutom en stilsäker och klar oversättning tre fängslande ock vetenskapligt högtståande bidrag. 

I sin inledning, given med sedvanlig elegans och imponerande – men aldrig tyngande – lärdom, tecknar Hugo Valentine bakgrunden til memoarerna ock ger dem en vidtspännande kulturhistorisk inställning. På grundval av ett omfattande forskningsmaterial skildrar S. Silberstein Aaron Isaacs oden under ären före svergeresan (1751-1774). 

Slutligen har Ellen Raphael med outtröttlig flit och beundransvärt skarpsinne lyckats ur arkiven leta fram ett otal biografiska notiser om de judar som nämnas i Aaron Isaacs minnen, ett arbete som bör bli av största nytta för fortsatta geneologiska studier av samma art. 

Som helhet betraktad ar denna Judiska littertursamfundets tionde volym en rangprestation ock därtill av ett så stort såväl judiskt som svenskt kulturhistorisk värde, att man med skal kan rekommendera den åt en var. Den typografiska utstyrelsen, det vackra trycket ock de goda tavelreproduktionerna har såväl redaktörerna som det geberska forlaget all heder av. 

Bernhard Tarschys
(1905 - 1978)